These calls
have come from people in separate organisations too.
The issue
raised with me concerned the tendency for a Leader/Manager who having taken a
position with a new employer, sets about recruiting past colleagues from one or
more of their previous employers.
The
implication in all cases is this is a negative behaviour, it's mates looking
after mates with the word "cronyism" even being used. It was even suggested such
practices should be banned.
I understand
the emotion that can surround such recruitments. I also understand the
implication that the same recruitment hurdles have not been jumped as for other,
perhaps unknown candidates. In one case, it was even suggested there was no
recruitment practice.
I also
understand the disappointment of one caller as their application had been unsuccessful.
I don’t agree
that the recruitment of a known commodity is a negative.
A Leader/Manager new to an organisation is desperate to impress. They will
know very well the strengths and weaknesses of those they have previously
worked closely with.
Given this
need to impress, they are not going to risk the appointment of someone they
know to be inadequate, in order to help out a “mate”. As they say in politics,
always back the horse called “Self Interest”.
It makes no sense to rule out highly capable people just because
there is a prior working relationship. It may even be discriminatory.
Further, talent
follows talent in all endeavours, business, creative and sporting. It makes
sense that highly capable people already known to a Leader/Manager, and where
the Leader/Manager is known to them, will form a positive union.
Movie
Directors cast Actors with whom they have worked previously, professional
sports people will be influenced to change clubs when a coach moves with the
Darius Boyd/Wayne Bennett relationship being an obvious and highly successful example.
In Business, people also follow other people.
There is
often disappointment when someone is appointed to a role you think you deserve
and it is understandable that reasons are looked for other than the fact they
are a better candidate.
Realistically, very
many positive outcomes evolve from appointment to positions of past colleagues of a known commodities.
But, as with
so many things, in the cases discussed over recent days, “Time Will Tell”.
No comments:
Post a Comment