A perfectly
reasonable question one friend or acquaintance may ask another.
It is also a
question that may be asked by one traveller to another in an airport, bus depot
or train station, particularly if experiencing a delay.
I wonder if
it is asked as often as it used to be as we move in to the age of the digital
reader and the world of ebooks.
We really have
no idea what someone is looking at if peering at a tablet device or similar as we cannot assume it is a book they are reading.
Is this
another way technology may be destroying verbal communication?
The "book question" may even
be asked at a first date, particularly if one party is a keen reader and values
such an interest in the other. Is she reading romance or science? Is he reading
a sporting autobiography or a mystery?
Like the
first date scenario, what we read may also be used to judge us, or to judge others.
As with many
judgements we make, the basis is our own paradigm. We all too often jump to
judgement followed quickly by conclusion.
As with
those who judge us, we scorn at their lack of understanding of “us” when
passing judgement.
Is this fair?
An article came
across my desk this week addressing “the question” well known “business
celebrities” always ask candidates interviewing for positions in their enterprise. The
article interested me because of a question I had been asked some 25 years
earlier when applying for a role.
It is also a
question that I have longed to ask candidates in the many dozen interviews I
have conducted over the year however have refrained from doing so.
I question I
was asked is:
What book
are you reading at the moment?
Fortunately,
I was about 75% through a book at the time and was able to easily answer the
question. However, I have often wondered just what the interviewer was
seeking to learn by asking it.
Was he
judging my reading preferences or simply seeing how well I could articulate an
answer?
Was he
seeking to put me off guard, or was it the opposite; he was seeking to put me
at ease?
We judge
people by the books they read, TV shows they watch, films they attend and music
they enjoy.
In doing so,
we almost certainly do not take in to account the reasons for such preferences.
One person may indulge in reality TV as a retreat from a demanding work day whereas another may seek refuse in a science program as a stimulation away from a boring job.
One person may indulge in reality TV as a retreat from a demanding work day whereas another may seek refuse in a science program as a stimulation away from a boring job.
I do wonder
if the world would be a better place if our judgements were less shallow and
better informed, based on a full story. Or maybe we should simply be more
accepting of each others individualities, family, colleagues, business
associates, clients and friends alike.
By the way,
I was not successful in the referred to Job Interview and the book I was
reading was an autobiography by Bob Ansett of Budget Rent a Car fame.
No comments:
Post a Comment