How often
have you heard this?
Have you
ever known a change of Senior Leader not being followed by a new (so called) strategy?
I have often
been amused to witness the overnight discrediting of the direction a business
is heading on a change of Leader/Manager.
Equally, I
have been an interested observer as the new Leader/Manager seeks to replicate much
or all of the environment from where they came including recruiting former colleagues.
A new Leader/Manager is the perfect opportunity for the introduction of new ideas. The problem is, all too often is ends up being a duplication or re-cycling of old ideas from another place.
In addition,
the so called “New Strategy” is often no more than a re-shuffle of the
organisation chart in order to deliver much the same or similar service or product
in much the same way, just supervised differently.
It is a
little harsh to call it all “smoke and mirrors”, but only a little.
Ideas are
important as is the discussion, debate and testing of ideas. An idea is just as
valuable when it is not taken up as it is when it is as long as it is debated and tested. I say this because
without the “dismissed” idea, it is impossible to stress test the existing
operation of strategy.
So much of
our so called strategic discussions are taken up talking about events. These
may be events that have occurred and we want to ensure never do again or they
may be imaginary events that we seek to mitigate against. Operational or
Strategic?
The second area where strategic thinking time is invested is discussing people, where they fit, what
they have to offer and what we need to do in order to “fit them in” or “manage
them out”.
Very little
of Corporate Strategic Development time and energy is devoted to the discussion of ideas. Any talk about
an idea is kept to a small group and all too often, a cohort of one.
Ideas are
risky, valuable, important but often discouraged, easily dismissed or simply
ignored.
A healthy,
energetic, sustainably successful and engaged work environment will include a
culture where ideas can be raised and discussed without fear of rejection,
retaliation, jealousy or the the threat to fragile egos.
Ideas
disrupt industries, businesses and business models.
However, it must surely to better to "Self Disrupt" than have an outside force provide the disruption.
However, it must surely to better to "Self Disrupt" than have an outside force provide the disruption.
Consider the
taxi industry. I am sure it would have rather had the means of review, idea
generation, re-invention and self-disruption than be subjected to the
force that is Uber.
No comments:
Post a Comment