Usually I
look back on my day, or an event in the day that may have triggered a memory,
an opinion or a thought and turned that in to some kind of article.
Today is
different.
There seems
to have been quite a number of small things that could trigger an article, but
these would be forced whereas usually an idea comes easily.
I could talk
about the new local anti cyclist hate group on Facebook and couple this with
the discussion at work deriding cyclists, triggered by someone who has a niece who
until recently was a member of a National Road Series team. To give her credit,
the irony was not lost on her.
I could talk
about someone I know who is on a work trip to a regional centre and panicking
that anticipated torrential rain storms that may close the airport.
This would mean an extended weekend stay in an area that for good reason, doesn’t
exactly promote tourism as a local industry.
I could talk
about the seemingly never ending pantomime that is unfolding under the disguise
of the Trump Presidency, however there is nothing amusing about this.
My mind
wanders to those who produce a piece of writing on a daily or semi daily basis
and are compensated for doing so.
It would be
easy for me to take one of my ‘half ideas’ and embellish it in to something
that perhaps only I would know it isn’t.
There are
checks and balances on the writers of hard facts, if only by way of the actual participants
in the story they are writing.
As I write,
it occurs to me that I have a much higher level of scrutiny over the
authenticity of what I produce. The scrutiny I have is, I will know if what I produce comes from the
heart or from the brain, or a balance of both.
At the end
of the article, I have to be able to look myself in the mirror.
No comments:
Post a Comment