I was
involved in a conversation yesterday about the Affordable Housing Crisis and
the ‘benefits’ that may result. (Yes, benefits)
I wondered aloud
if the Housing Affordability issue may result in a positive societal change.
Australian’s
are brought up under a doctrine of being home owners. In a by gone age, the 3
bedroom, brick veneer, garage, lawn, Holden in the drive way and Victa lawn
mower in the shed was the Australian Dream.
We live in a
world where Home Ownership is a sign of success and stability and by
definition, not owning a home is a sign of the opposite.
If this
notion applied to New York City, successful Investment Bankers, Accounting
Executives, Interior Designers and many others would be deemed, well, less successful
and less stable.
New York is a
City of renters, with rentals making up two thirds of housing stock.*
Is Sydney to
become as City of renters?
Australia is becoming
a Country without State Borders. Moving Intercity or Intrastate or work and career
opportunity is common among Graduates and those growing, or diversifying a
career. Why not rent and invest surplus cash flow in other areas?
The quality
of rental accommodation has improved in New York to an extent where you get all
the modern facilities and amenities once the preserve of the owner occupier.
This is happening in Australia too as inner city apartment blocks come on line.
Needs change –
the renting young professional couple make the decision to start a family and
the single bedroom rental apartment of the last five years gives way to a suburban
dwelling: it may even be purchased. The sheer transactional cost of buying and
selling and buying again is yet another argument for renting.
Except for
one thing; 5 years.
In this
country, the 6 month lease is standard, providing little or no ‘occupation security’. Renters
are subjected to regular market moves and are at the whim of the landlord who
may think a few extra dollars can be squeezed out of their investment by going
to tender regularly.
Maybe the
solution to our housing crisis is to first reform our rental regulations
providing more security of tenure to ‘solid’ tenants. The key element would be longer
term leases. In addition some control over rental rates would provide
confidence to the renter to make their residence a home while also providing more
security of regular income to owners, be it at the expense of big increases in
high demand, but less risk of non-occupancy.
However,
perhaps a change in the Great Australian Home Ownership Dream has to also take
place.
.*Reference: Jonathan
J. Miller, President and Chief Executive Miller Samuel) in New York Times Article
19 May 2017)
No comments:
Post a Comment